The decisions that Brutus makes control the outcome of the play and history. Brutus is found to be a troubled man. He usually gave a lot of thought to any of his decisions.
Julius Caesar William Shakespeare. BUY SHARE. BUY! Home; Literature Notes; Julius Caesar; The Question of Leadership; Table of Contents. All Subjects. Play Summary; About Julius Caesar; Character List; Summary and Analysis; there are gradations of character fault in this play and Brutus is more sympathetic than other characters. He . Julius Caesar Essay Throughout the play “Julius Caesar” by William Shakespeare, there is a very evident case of a tragic hero. A tragic hero is “a man of noble stature who is not an ordinary man, but a man with outstanding quality and greatness about him. - In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare there are several people who would be good rulers of Rome. Out of them all Brutus would have been the best choice to lead Rome. Brutus would be the best chosen leader for Rome for several reasons. Brutus was a very smart man and smartness is a very good quality for a leader.
These are central questions in Julius Caesar. The Elizabethan expectation would be that the ruling class ought to rule and that they ought to rule in the best interests of the people.
Such is not the case in the Rome of this play. Barely controlled chaos has come to Rome, and this unsettled state is personified in the first scene of Julius Caesar through the characters of the cobbler and the carpenter.
These characters give readers a sense that the people themselves are a sort of amorphous mass, potentially dangerous and, at the same time, absolutely essential to the success of the ruling class.
Throughout the play, they are addressed: Caesar must give them entertainment and seeks their approbation for his crowning, Brutus recognizes that he must explain his actions to them, and Antony uses them for his own purposes. These same threats and concerns resonated to an Elizabethan audience.
At the time this play was performed incivil strife was within living memory. In addition, despite all of his efforts, Henry had not provided a living and legitimate male heir for England. At his death, his daughter Mary returned the church to the bosom of Rome, demanding that her subjects align themselves with Catholicism.
When Mary, too, died without heir, her sister, Elizabeth, took the throne. What followed was a long period, from to her death inof relative peace and prosperity. She was, after all, a woman, and according to the Elizabethan understanding of order, men ruled women, not the other way around.
Her subjects wished for Elizabeth to marry for a number of reasons. They would have felt much more secure knowing that a man was in charge, but further, they were tired of worries over succession.
A legitimate heir was necessary. The Queen, on the other hand, over the period of her fertility refused the suits of a number of appropriate men, knowing that once married, she would no longer rule the realm.
By the time this play was performed Elizabeth was an old woman, well beyond the age of childbearing.
Even then, she refused to name an heir and the country worried that they would face another period of unrest at her death.
But even without this historical context, Elizabethans would have been interested in questions of order and hierarchy — questions raised by the political upheaval of Julius Caesar.
The Elizabethan worldview was one in which everyone had their place. In many ways, they understood the world in terms of the family unit. God was the head of the heavenly family, with Jesus as his son.
The monarch was subservient only to God, receiving power to head the English family from Him.Get an answer for 'What are the good and bad character traits of Brutus and Cassius in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar?' and find homework help for .
Because of their great leadership qualities, Brutus and Cassius take the leader roles among the conspirators. Nevertheless, they at times do argue over the course of action.
Though Brutus and Cassius are both similar in that they are great leaders, their differences in character are instrumental in determining the conclusion of the play. In Shakespeare s tragedy Julius Caesar, the use of diverse leaders plays an important role in the plot, showing vividly how strong personalities conflict.
This is the case with Brutus and Cassius, the two leaders among the several conspirators. The story of . Because of their great leadership qualities, Brutus and Cassius take the leader roles among the conspirators. Nevertheless, they at times do argue over the course of action.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, conspirators, In the play JULIUS CAESAR Brutus is the most noble character. He stands up for what he . Julius Caesar This tendency to place character conception before historic truth is best illustrated in Julius Caesar by the portrayal of Caesar himself.
Shakespeare insists, despite history, that he is a tyrant, weak in body and mind, easily flattered, vain, superstitious.
William Shakespeare - Julius Caesar: Written in (the same year as Henry V) or , probably for the opening of the Globe Theatre on the south bank of the Thames, Julius Caesar illustrates similarly the transition in Shakespeare’s writing toward darker themes and tragedy.